Writing Again

469Remember this mug from last Friday? I want it. It serves a dual purpose–it would announce to whomever may care that I’m writing again and, if I’m not writing again, it would serve as a constant reminder that I’m supposed to be.

I finally arrived at the “writing again” stage. Months ago, I finished Skydiving to Love, a novella to be released in a collection with other authors (Pamela S. Meyers, Jessica Ferguson, and Angela Breidenbach) called The Bucket List Dare, and I haven’t written anything more substantial than a blog post since.

I thought, after trying Katie’s Outlining Your Novel workbook, that I would outline again. I was excited about my experiment based on her instruction at first — and I still highly recommend it — but I still land squarely in the “hybrid” hole. I can’t shake doing things the way I’ve always done them. My way works for me.

Here’s a list of things I already knew about Ride to the Altar by last year, when I wrote its cover copy to put in the back of The Final Ride as a tease (and also to let my readers know that The Final Ride isn’t final):

  • Some of my readers wanted me to solve the mystery of who killed Talon’s first fiance, Janet.
  • Others of my readers wanted to see Talon and Patricia’s wedding.
  • I’ve left hints in the past two books in this series that Patricia and her mother don’t get along.
  • I left hints in the last book that a minor character is going to pass away.
  • There’s a condition called “weak calf syndrome,” in which a calf is so weak when it’s born that it can’t stand long enough to get nourishment–some aren’t strong enough to suck. I found out about this on the RFD channel a couple of years ago and tucked notes away just in case I could ever use the information.

These are the things I’ve had to come up with:

  • Who, among all the characters already introduced in the two previous books, killed Janet?
  • Why don’t Patricia and her mother get along?
  • How will the death of the minor character and “weak calf syndrome” fit into the new story?

I’ve been mulling all this over and trying to flesh it out for a year. I knew I’d be introducing a new character — Patricia’s mother (yet another Yankee) — but I also knew that I’ve played the fish-out-of-water theme to death. I have to come up with something different. And I have to come up with an excellent reason she didn’t want Patricia to marry Talon. Have to decide how Patricia reacts to the reason, how she reacts to her mother, how she grows/changes due to her relationship with her mother.

Not long ago, when Mom was in getting her eyes tested, I got hit with a barrage of ideas, which is always the case when I’m away from home and the only thing I have to write on is a little 4″ x 5″ notebook with only three pages remaining. Believe me, I made the most of those three pages.

Everything gelled after that. I know what’s going to happen and where and when and why and how and who all it’s going to affect and how it’ll affect them and why. It’s all in my head. It took me over a year to get it there, but it’s there now. Months and months of scrabbling around in my mind for the answers to the “journalistic” questions. Doesn’t mean I won’t chase rabbits, but at least I know my story well enough not to follow those little furry butts too far away from the plot.

That’s the process I went through when writing Give the Lady a Ride and The Final Ride. It’s the same process I started for The Cat Lady’s Secretbut as some tragedies hit our family while I was writing it, I tended to chase too many rabbits down some pretty dark holes. The results don’t match the intentions, but it’s still a great book.

Then there’s The Simulacrum — in a league of its own. Brad outlined it, I wrote it. Doesn’t count.

The “hybrid” part of all this comes while I’m writing. In my head, I know what’s going to happen in my novel, but getting everything down on paper is a different animal entirely. As I write, I come up with ideas about the next scene, the one after, and so on, and I stop writing long enough to do a quick outline of them, including character reactions, etc. Sometimes my characters do and say things that take me by surprise, so — if I want to use that little surprise — I have to “interview” them to figure out where it came from. Everything has to be accounted for, so if a character does something that’s contrary to their established personality, I have to figure out why and how to make it fit based on information I’ve already provided about that character. So, yes, I do character bios, but primarily as I go along, not before I know who they are.

So there you go: my “method,” if you want to call it that. And finally, part 1 of my method — the part about getting an idea fleshed out enough to actually start writing — is complete.

Now, I can proudly say I’m writing another novel!

About Linda W. Yezak

Author/Freelance Editor/Speaker (writing and editing topics).
This entry was posted in write tips, Writing, Writing Tips and tagged , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

8 Responses to Writing Again

  1. Chris White says:

    Excellent. Write on.


  2. Congratulations! That’s a great place to be. 😉


  3. I was mulling on the writing process this morning, thinking about how much I love my process and how it just makes so much sense to me–and also how I undoubtedly think it’s perfect because it so perfectly fits *my* personality. :p

    I don’t think there’s one right system for writing. I think it really does depend on the writer’s personality and how they take in and process information. We all find the processes that work for us and stick with them.


  4. Doc Ellis says:

    Awesome! Go, go, go! Praying for continued success, my sweet writer friend!


Talk to me--I love comments!

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.